Mitigating Fragmented SQL Injection Attacks: Effective Solutions

Article arrow_drop_down

[ad_1]

This blog post breaks down Fragmented SQL Injection, a method hackers use to bypass authentication by manipulating two different input fields at the same time. Our security expert explains why single quotes matter in SQL injection attacks and how using Prepared Statements (also called Parameterized Queries) can effectively prevent these types of exploits.

LEARN MORE: How to prevent SQL Injection

If you ask someone how to check for an SQL injection vulnerability in a web application, their first suggestion might be to enter a single quote () into an input field. If the application responds with an error, it could indicate that the input is interfering with the database query—a classic sign of SQL injection. In fact, some people even refer to SQL injection as “Single Quote Injection” because of how often this method is used to test for vulnerabilities.

However, attackers are not limited to simple single-quote injections. Our research explores Fragmented SQL Injection, a more advanced technique where hackers manipulate two separate input fields within the same query context to bypass authentication systems. Understanding how single quotes affect database queries is essential to recognizing and preventing these types of attacks. Let’s take a closer look.

The Role of Single Quotes in SQL Injection Attacks

In many systems—such as command interpreters, file systems, and databases—certain characters have special meanings. These characters, known as metacharacters, can change how a system processes commands. In SQL, single () and double () quotes act as string delimiters, marking the beginning and end of a text-based input.

Because of this, injecting an unescaped single or double quote into a database query can break the query’s structure, often resulting in a syntax error. Consider the following SQL statement:

SELECT * FROM users WHERE username="USER_INPUT'

If an attacker enters a single quote () as input, the database query may become malformed, leading to an error:

$username = "'";

$query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE username="".$username."""

Resulting SQL Query

SELECT * FROM users WHERE username=""''

Here, the database is unable to process the query because the extra, unmatched single quote disrupts the expected syntax. This type of error is a key indicator that user input is not properly filtered or sanitized, making the system potentially vulnerable to SQL injection attacks.

When Single Quotes Aren’t Needed for SQL Injection

While string-based SQL queries are affected by quote injection, not all database queries rely on string inputs. Consider a scenario where the application queries a database using an integer-based identifier:

$query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id=" . $user_input;

In this case, single or double quotes are unnecessary. Instead, an attacker would need to inject a numeric value that modifies the SQL statement to execute unintended commands.

Blacklisting or Escaping Single Quotes

To defend against simple SQL injection attempts, some systems escape or blacklist single quotes, preventing them from breaking the query. However, this method is not foolproof.

For example, if a hacker attempts to inject the following payload:

$username = "' or 1=1 --";

$password = "qwerty123456";

$query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE username="".$username."" AND password='".$password."'";

The resulting SQL query would be:

SELECT * FROM users WHERE username="\" or 1=1 -- ' or password='qwerty123456';

Since the single quote () is escaped with a backslash (\), the injection attempt fails, as the query no longer executes the intended malicious logic.

While escaping single quotes can reduce the risk of basic SQL injection attacks, it is not a complete solution. The most effective way to prevent SQL injection is by using Prepared Statements (Parameterized Queries), which separate user input from SQL commands entirely, ensuring that injected values cannot alter the intended logic of the query.

Understanding Fragmented SQL Injection

Fragmented SQL Injection is an attack technique where multiple input fields are manipulated together to bypass authentication or other security controls. While not originally named by its discoverer, this method allows attackers to split their malicious payloads across different input fields to evade detection mechanisms such as blacklists and character limits.

How Fragmented SQL Injection Works

In a typical SQL injection attack, a hacker might insert a single quote () to break the query structure. However, some systems automatically escape special characters using a backslash (\), preventing direct injection. Fragmented SQL injection gets around this by splitting the payload between two input fields that are processed within the same SQL query context.

Consider the following authentication attempt:

Input Fields:

Username: \

Password: or 1 #

Resulting Query:

SELECT * FROM users WHERE username="\" and password=' or 1 # ';

Why This Works

  • The backslash (\) entered in the username field escapes the next single quote (), neutralizing it.
  • The password field then contains the payload: or 1 #, which modifies the logic of the SQL statement.
  • Since or 1 is always true, the query successfully authenticates the attacker without needing a valid password.
  • The # (hash) character acts as a comment marker, telling the database to ignore the rest of the query, effectively bypassing any remaining authentication checks.

The Impact

By leveraging this technique, an attacker can bypass login forms and authentication mechanisms, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts or administrative controls. Traditional input validation and blacklists may fail to detect this attack since each input field alone appears harmless—but when processed together, they form a complete SQL injection payload.

Preventing Fragmented SQL Injection

To protect against this technique, applications should implement strong SQL injection defenses, including:

  • Prepared Statements (Parameterized Queries) – These ensure user inputs are treated as data, not SQL commands.
  • Strict Input Validation – Disallow escape characters and enforce input length constraints.
  • Escaping and Encoding – Ensure user input cannot break query logic.
  • Limiting Error Messages – Avoid revealing query structure through error responses.

The Limitations of Filtering Functions in SQL Injection Prevention

A referenced blog post suggests using PHP’s htmlentities() function to filter user inputs as a way to prevent SQL injection attacks. When configured with the ENT_QUOTES flag, this function converts special characters—such as single quotes (), double quotes (), and HTML tags—into their corresponding HTML entities. For example, a double quote would be encoded as:

While this method may reduce the risk of injection in some cases, it is not a foolproof solution. SQL injection attacks can still be executed without using single or double quotes, making this approach insufficient as a primary defense mechanism. Additionally, legacy encoding tricks like GBK encoding can sometimes bypass security functions such as addslashes() in PHP, further weakening this type of input filtering.

Why Prepared Statements Are the Best Defense Against SQL Injection

The most effective and reliable way to prevent SQL injection attacks is by using Prepared Statements, also known as Parameterized Queries.

Why Prepared Statements Work:

  • They separate SQL query structure from user input, ensuring that user data is treated strictly as a value, not as part of the SQL command.
  • Unlike filtering-based approaches, they are resistant to evolving SQL injection techniques.
  • They eliminate the need for manual escaping, making the code more secure and less prone to errors.

Many input filtering techniques, including htmlentities(), may offer partial protection, but attackers continue to find ways to bypass them. Relying on these methods alone leaves applications vulnerable to new attack techniques, making Prepared Statements the only consistently reliable approach for preventing SQL injection.

Implementing Parameterized Queries in PHP and .NET

Using Parameterized Queries is the most effective way to protect applications from SQL injection attacks. Below are examples of how to implement this approach in PHP and .NET to ensure secure database queries.

Parameterized Queries in PHP

In PHP, the prepare() method is used to define an SQL statement with placeholders, and bindParam() assigns values securely:

$stmt = $dbh->prepare("UPDATE users SET email=:new_email WHERE id=:user_id");

$stmt->bindParam(':new_email', $email);

$stmt->bindParam(':user_id', $id);

Parameterized Queries in .NET

For .NET applications, parameterized queries are implemented using the SqlCommand class. Instead of inserting raw user input into the SQL statement, parameters are explicitly defined and assigned values:

string sql = "SELECT * FROM Customers WHERE CustomerId = @CustomerId";

SqlCommand command = new SqlCommand(sql);

command.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("@CustomerId", System.Data.SqlDbType.Int));

command.Parameters["@CustomerId"].Value = 1;

Why Prepared Statements Are Essential

Many developers still rely on blacklist-based filtering to block SQL injection attempts, either manually or through functions like addslashes(). However, attackers continue to develop new techniques to bypass these defenses, making blacklist-based approaches unreliable.

The only consistently effective way to prevent SQL injection vulnerabilities is by using Prepared Statements (Parameterized Queries). This method ensures that user input is always treated as data rather than part of the SQL command, effectively neutralizing injection attempts at the database level.

THE AUTHOR

Acunetix

Acunetix developers and tech agents regularly contribute to the blog. All the Acunetix developers come with years of experience in the web security sphere.

[ad_2]

Source link

About the author

trending_flat
JSON Web Token Attacks And Vulnerabilities

[ad_1] JSON Web Tokens (JWTs) are a widely used method for securely exchanging data in JSON format. Due to their ability to be digitally signed and verified, they are commonly used for authorization and authentication. However, their security depends entirely on proper implementation—when misconfigured, JWTs can introduce serious vulnerabilities. This guide explores common JWT attacks and security flaws, providing a technical deep dive into how these weaknesses can be exploited and how to mitigate them. The Structure of a JSON Web Token (JWT) A JSON Web Token (JWT) is composed of three parts: a header, payload, and signature, all encoded using Base64URLand separated by dots. The format follows this structure: HEADER.PAYLOAD.SIGNATURE Here is an example of a real JWT: eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9. eyJuYW1lIjoiSm9obiBEb2UiLCJ1c2VyX25hbWUiOiJqb2huLmRvZSIsImlzX2FkbWluIjpmYWxzZX0. fSppjHFaqlNcpK1Q8VudRD84YIuhqFfA67XkLam0_aY Breaking Down the JWT Header The header contains metadata that defines the token’s properties, including: The algorithm (alg) […]

trending_flat
Mitigating Fragmented SQL Injection Attacks: Effective Solutions

[ad_1] This blog post breaks down Fragmented SQL Injection, a method hackers use to bypass authentication by manipulating two different input fields at the same time. Our security expert explains why single quotes matter in SQL injection attacks and how using Prepared Statements (also called Parameterized Queries) can effectively prevent these types of exploits. LEARN MORE: How to prevent SQL Injection If you ask someone how to check for an SQL injection vulnerability in a web application, their first suggestion might be to enter a single quote (‘) into an input field. If the application responds with an error, it could indicate that the input is interfering with the database query—a classic sign of SQL injection. In fact, some people even refer to SQL injection as “Single Quote Injection” because of how often this method is used to test for […]

trending_flat
Preventing CSRF Attacks with Anti-CSRF Tokens: Best Practices and Implementation

[ad_1] The most widely used method to prevent cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks is the implementation of anti-CSRF tokens. These are unique values generated by a web application and validated with each request to ensure authenticity. CSRF attacks exploit a user’s active session to execute unauthorized actions, such as redirecting them to a malicious website or accessing sensitive session data. To effectively mitigate these risks, it is essential to generate, manage, and validate CSRF tokens correctly, ensuring robust protection against unauthorized requests. What Is an Anti-CSRF Token? An anti-CSRF token (also known as a CSRF token) is a security mechanism designed to verify the legitimacy of a user’s request. It works by assigning a unique, unpredictable token to the user’s browser, which must be included in subsequent requests. This ensures that the request originates from the authenticated user and not […]

trending_flat
XSS Filter Evasion: How Attackers Bypass XSS Filters – And Why Filtering Alone Isn’t Enough

[ad_1] XSS filter evasion techniques allow attackers to bypass cross-site scripting (XSS) protections designed to block malicious scripts. This article explores some of the most common filter bypass strategies, explains why relying solely on filtering is ineffective, and outlines the best practices for preventing XSS attacks. Attackers have developed hundreds of methods to evade XSS filters, making it clear that filtering alone is not a foolproof defense. For an XSS attack to succeed, two conditions must be met: The application must have an XSS vulnerability that allows user-controlled input to be injected into web pages. The attacker must find a way to execute malicious JavaScript within the victim’s browser. XSS filtering aims to stop these attacks by detecting and removing suspicious code before it reaches the browser. However, because attackers continuously develop new techniques to disguise or encode their payloads, […]

trending_flat
Disabling Directory Listing on Your Web Server – And Why It Matters

[ad_1] By default, some web servers allow directory listing, which means that if no default index file (such as index.html or index.php) is present, the server will display a list of all files and directories in that folder. This can expose sensitive files, scripts, and configurations, making it easier for attackers to identify vulnerabilities. Understanding Directory Listing Directory listing is a web server feature that, when enabled, displays the contents of a directory if no default index file (such as index.html or index.php) is present. When a request is made to such a directory, the server automatically generates and returns a list of all files and subdirectories within it. This can pose a security risk by exposing sensitive files related to a web application, potentially revealing critical information. If attackers gain access to directory listings, they can analyze file structures, […]

trending_flat
Strengthen Your Web Applications with HTTP Security Headers | Acunetix

[ad_1] What is a HTTP security header? An HTTP security header is a response header that helps protect web applications by providing browsers with specific instructions on how to handle website content securely. These headers play a crucial role in mitigating various cyber threats, such as cross-site scripting (XSS), clickjacking, and data injection attacks. By configuring HTTP security headers correctly, organizations can enforce stricter security policies, restrict unauthorized resource loading, and reduce the risk of malicious exploitation. Common HTTP security headers include Content Security Policy (CSP) to prevent injection attacks, Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS) to enforce secure HTTPS connections, and X-Frame-Options to prevent clickjacking. Implementing these headers is a fundamental and effective way to enhance web application security, providing an additional layer of defense against cyber threats. Enhancing Your Web Application’s Security with HTTP Security Headers In web application security testing, vulnerabilities […]

Related

trending_flat
Defend the Airport

[ad_1] Every day, millions of passengers depend on a vast, complex airport ecosystem to get from Point A to Point B. From airline check-ins and baggage handling to air traffic control and terminal operations, the aviation sector is an intricate web of interconnected third-party providers, technologies, and stakeholders. In this high-stakes environment, a cybersecurity breach is not a single point of failure, it’s a ripple effect waiting to happen. Cyber Threats Aren’t Just IT Problems – They’re Operational Crises When people think about airport cybersecurity, they often picture network firewalls at airline headquarters or secure software for booking systems. But the real threat landscape is far broader and far more vulnerable. If a catering supplier is hit with ransomware, the aircraft turnaround slows. If the baggage conveyor system is compromised, luggage piles up, delaying departures. If the security contractor experiences […]

trending_flat
Securing LLMs Against Prompt Injection Attacks

[ad_1] Introduction Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly become integral to applications, but they come with some very interesting security pitfalls. Chief among these is prompt injection, where cleverly crafted inputs make an LLM bypass its instructions or leak secrets. Prompt injection in fact is so wildly popular that, OWASP now ranks prompt injection as the #1 AI security risk for modern LLM applications as shown in their OWASP GenAI top 10. We’ve provided a higher-level overview about Prompt Injection in our other blog, so in this one we’ll focus on the concept with the technical audience in mind. Here we’ll explore how LLMs can be vulnerable at the architectural level and the sophisticated ways attackers exploit them. We’ll also examine effective defenses, from system prompt design to “sandwich” prompting techniques. We’ll also discuss a few tools that can help […]

trending_flat
LLM Prompt Injection – What’s the Business Risk, and What to Do About It

[ad_1] The rise of generative AI offers incredible opportunities for businesses. Large Language Models can automate customer service, generate insightful analytics, and accelerate content creation. But alongside these benefits comes a new category of security risk that business leaders must understand: Prompt Injection Attacks. In simple terms, a prompt injection is when someone feeds an AI model malicious or deceptive input that causes it to behave in an unintended, and often harmful way. This isn’t just a technical glitch, it’s a serious threat that can lead to brand embarrassment, data leaks, or compliance violations if not addressed. As organizations rush to adopt AI capabilities, ensuring the security of those AI systems is now a board-level concern. In this post we’ll provide a high-level overview of prompt injection risks, why they matter to your business, and how Security Innovation’s GenAI Penetration […]

trending_flat
Setting Up a Pentesting Environment for the Meta Quest 2

[ad_1] With the advent of commercially available virtual reality headsets, such as the Meta Quest, the integration of virtual and augmented reality into our daily lives feels closer than ever before. As these devices become more common, so too will the need to secure and protect the data collected and stored by them. The intention of this blog post is to establish a baseline security testing environment for Meta Quest 2 applications and is split into three sections: Enabling Developer Mode, Establishing an Intercepting Proxy, and Injecting Frida Gadget. The Quest 2 runs on a modified version of the Android Open Source Project (AOSP) in addition to proprietary software developed by Meta, allowing the adoption of many established Android testing methods.   Enabling Developer Mode The first step of setting up a security testing environment on the Quest is to […]

trending_flat
Kiren Rijiju: Why Earth Sciences minister Rijiju is upset with this European IT company |

[ad_1] Earth Sciences Minister Kiren Rijiju is reportedly upset with the French IT company Atos. Reason is said to be delay in the delivery of two supercomputers by the French company to Indian weather forecasting institutes. According to a report in news agency PTI, the Earth Sciences Ministry had ordered two supercomputers worth $100 million from French firm Eviden, of the Atos Group, last year to enhance the computing capabilities of its institutions -- the National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (NCMRWF) and the Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology (IITM)."I am more upset because the target we set was December. The Union Cabinet had already approved purchasing the supercomputer. We have only four petaflop capacity. We want to install up to 18 petaflop capacity," Rijiju told PTI in a video interview.He said that the French company ran into some […]

trending_flat
Former Activision boss reportedly wants to buy TikTok

[ad_1] Bobby Kotick, the former head of Activision Blizzard, is reportedly considering buying TikTok, as the app could be banned in the United States. The Wall Street Journal reports that Kotick has talked to ByteDance, the company that owns TikTok, about buying the app, which could cost hundreds of billions of dollars.This comes as US lawmakers introduce a new bill that would make ByteDance sell TikTok within six months or stop it from being available in US app stores.President Joe Biden has said he would approve the bill if it passes in Congress.The Wall Street Journal report adds that Kotick, the head of OpenAI, Sam Altman, discussed teaming up to buy TikTok at a dinner last week. Kotick's interest in TikTok follows a rough end to his 30 years leading Activision Blizzard, which Microsoft acquired last year. The company faced […]

Be the first to leave a comment

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *